↓ Skip to main content

The early bird catches the term: combining twitter and news data for event detection and situational awareness

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomedical Semantics, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The early bird catches the term: combining twitter and news data for event detection and situational awareness
Published in
Journal of Biomedical Semantics, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13326-016-0103-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas Thapen, Donal Simmie, Chris Hankin

Abstract

Twitter updates now represent an enormous stream of information originating from a wide variety of formal and informal sources, much of which is relevant to real-world events. They can therefore be highly useful for event detection and situational awareness applications. In this paper we apply customised filtering techniques to existing bio-surveillance algorithms to detect localised spikes in Twitter activity, showing that these correspond to real events with a high level of confidence. We then develop a methodology to automatically summarise these events, both by providing the tweets which best describe the event and by linking to highly relevant news articles. This news linkage is accomplished by identifying terms occurring more frequently in the event tweets than in a baseline of activity for the area concerned, and using these to search for news. We apply our methods to outbreaks of illness and events strongly affecting sentiment and are able to detect events verifiable by third party sources and produce high quality summaries. This study demonstrates linking event detection from Twitter with relevant online news to provide situational awareness. This builds on the existing studies that focus on Twitter alone, showing that integrating information from multiple online sources can produce useful analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 23%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Professor 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 17 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 24 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 23 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2022.
All research outputs
#6,067,021
of 22,893,031 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Semantics
#104
of 364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,817
of 320,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Semantics
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,893,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 364 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.