↓ Skip to main content

ETHNOPRED: a novel machine learning method for accurate continental and sub-continental ancestry identification and population stratification correction

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ETHNOPRED: a novel machine learning method for accurate continental and sub-continental ancestry identification and population stratification correction
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-14-61
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohsen Hajiloo, Yadav Sapkota, John R Mackey, Paula Robson, Russell Greiner, Sambasivarao Damaraju

Abstract

Population stratification is a systematic difference in allele frequencies between subpopulations. This can lead to spurious association findings in the case-control genome wide association studies (GWASs) used to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with disease-linked phenotypes. Methods such as self-declared ancestry, ancestry informative markers, genomic control, structured association, and principal component analysis are used to assess and correct population stratification but each has limitations. We provide an alternative technique to address population stratification.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
India 1 1%
France 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 66 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 30%
Researcher 14 20%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 15%
Computer Science 10 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 12 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2013.
All research outputs
#12,810,401
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,756
of 7,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,861
of 192,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#77
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.