↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of clinical analytical sensitivity and specificity of next-generation sequencing for detection of simple and complex mutations

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomic Data, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of clinical analytical sensitivity and specificity of next-generation sequencing for detection of simple and complex mutations
Published in
BMC Genomic Data, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2156-14-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ephrem LH Chin, Cristina da Silva, Madhuri Hegde

Abstract

Detecting mutations in disease genes by full gene sequence analysis is common in clinical diagnostic laboratories. Sanger dideoxy terminator sequencing allows for rapid development and implementation of sequencing assays in the clinical laboratory, but it has limited throughput, and due to cost constraints, only allows analysis of one or at most a few genes in a patient. Next-generation sequencing (NGS), on the other hand, has evolved rapidly, although to date it has mainly been used for large-scale genome sequencing projects and is beginning to be used in the clinical diagnostic testing. One advantage of NGS is that many genes can be analyzed easily at the same time, allowing for mutation detection when there are many possible causative genes for a specific phenotype. In addition, regions of a gene typically not tested for mutations, like deep intronic and promoter mutations, can also be detected.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Mexico 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 184 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 51 27%
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Other 20 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 34 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 15%
Computer Science 4 2%
Arts and Humanities 4 2%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 43 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,570,393
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomic Data
#67
of 1,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,513
of 204,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomic Data
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,204 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.