You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Understanding the Canadian adult CT head rule trial: use of the theoretical domains framework for process evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-25 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Janet A Curran, Jamie Brehaut, Andrea M Patey, Martin Osmond, Ian Stiell, Jeremy M Grimshaw |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 209 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 36 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 16% |
| Researcher | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 44 | 21% |
| Unknown | 36 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 34% |
| Psychology | 26 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 29 | 14% |
| Unknown | 42 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2018.
All research outputs
#3,815,678
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#740
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,418
of 208,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#15
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.