You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of nanobody-horseradish peroxidase-based sandwich ELISA to detect Salmonella Enteritidis in milk and in vivo colonization in chicken
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-022-01376-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kui Gu, Zengxu Song, Changyu Zhou, Peng Ma, Chao Li, Qizhong Lu, Ziwei Liao, Zheren Huang, Yizhi Tang, Hao Li, Yu Zhao, Wenjun Yan, Changwei Lei, Hongning Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 16 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2022.
All research outputs
#15,835,143
of 23,530,272 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#693
of 1,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,281
of 444,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#52
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,530,272 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,530 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.