You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Biodegradable and biocompatible subcutaneous implants consisted of pH-sensitive mebendazole-loaded/folic acid-targeted chitosan nanoparticles for murine triple-negative breast cancer treatment
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, March 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12951-022-01380-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Amirhosein Kefayat, Maryam Hosseini, Fatemeh Ghahremani, Nafise Arbab Jolfaie, Mohammad Rafienia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
Researcher | 3 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Professor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 16 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 3 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 6% |
Chemical Engineering | 2 | 6% |
Chemistry | 2 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 18 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2023.
All research outputs
#15,831,100
of 23,524,722 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#692
of 1,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,193
of 443,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#52
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,524,722 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,527 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.