↓ Skip to main content

A mathematical model of the unfolded protein stress response reveals the decision mechanism for recovery, adaptation and apoptosis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Systems Biology, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A mathematical model of the unfolded protein stress response reveals the decision mechanism for recovery, adaptation and apoptosis
Published in
BMC Systems Biology, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1752-0509-7-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kamil Erguler, Myrtani Pieri, Constantinos Deltas

Abstract

The unfolded protein response (UPR) is a major signalling cascade acting in the quality control of protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The cascade is known to play an accessory role in a range of genetic and environmental disorders including neurodegenerative and cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and kidney diseases. The three major receptors of the ER stress involved with the UPR, i.e. IRE1 α, PERK and ATF6, signal through a complex web of pathways to convey an appropriate response. The emerging behaviour ranges from adaptive to maladaptive depending on the severity of unfolded protein accumulation in the ER; however, the decision mechanism for the switch and its timing have so far been poorly understood.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 132 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 19%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Master 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 6%
Engineering 7 5%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 25 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2013.
All research outputs
#14,638,545
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#516
of 1,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,021
of 195,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.