You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Headache onset after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Headache and Pain, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s10194-022-01400-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matteo Castaldo, Marta Waliszewska-Prosół, Maria Koutsokera, Micaela Robotti, Marcin Straburzyński, Loukia Apostolakopoulou, Mariarita Capizzi, Oneda Çibuku, Fidel Dominique Festin Ambat, Ilaria Frattale, Zukhra Gadzhieva, Erica Gallo, Anna Gryglas-Dworak, Gleni Halili, Asel Jusupova, Yana Koperskaya, Alo-Rainer Leheste, Maria Laura Manzo, Andrea Marcinnò, Antonio Marino, Petr Mikulenka, Bee Eng Ong, Burcu Polat, Zvonimir Popovic, Eduardo Rivera-Mancilla, Adina Maria Roceanu, Eleonora Rollo, Marina Romozzi, Claudia Ruscitto, Fabrizio Scotto di Clemente, Sebastian Strauss, Valentina Taranta, Maria Terhart, Iryna Tychenko, Simone Vigneri, Blazej Misiak, Paolo Martelletti, Alberto Raggi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 10 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 8% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Lithuania | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 82% |
| Scientists | 4 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 50 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 52 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,069,803
of 25,822,778 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Headache and Pain
#116
of 1,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,043
of 450,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Headache and Pain
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,822,778 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,564 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.