You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Co-production practice and future research priorities in United Kingdom-funded applied health research: a scoping review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-022-00838-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helen Smith, Luke Budworth, Chloe Grindey, Isabel Hague, Natalie Hamer, Roman Kislov, Peter van der Graaf, Joe Langley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 105 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 55 | 52% |
| Australia | 6 | 6% |
| Canada | 6 | 6% |
| Ireland | 4 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Curaçao | 1 | <1% |
| Cameroon | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 46% |
| Scientists | 42 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 97 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 21% |
| Researcher | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 34 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 13% |
| Psychology | 10 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 40 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2023.
All research outputs
#652,060
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#35
of 1,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,901
of 448,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#2
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.