↓ Skip to main content

Reproducibility of global and segmental myocardial strain using cine DENSE at 3 T: a multicenter cardiovascular magnetic resonance study in healthy subjects and patients with heart disease

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reproducibility of global and segmental myocardial strain using cine DENSE at 3 T: a multicenter cardiovascular magnetic resonance study in healthy subjects and patients with heart disease
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, April 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12968-022-00851-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel A. Auger, Sona. Ghadimi, Xiaoying Cai, Claire E. Reagan, Changyu Sun, Mohamad Abdi, Jie Jane Cao, Joshua Y. Cheng, Nora Ngai, Andrew D. Scott, Pedro F. Ferreira, John N. Oshinski, Nick Emamifar, Daniel B. Ennis, Michael Loecher, Zhan-Qiu Liu, Pierre Croisille, Magalie Viallon, Kenneth C. Bilchick, Frederick H. Epstein

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Student > Master 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 14 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 16%
Engineering 3 12%
Computer Science 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,409,667
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#676
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,859
of 449,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.