You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bursting out of our bubble: using creative techniques to communicate within the systematic review process and beyond
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-022-01935-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jo Thompson Coon, Noreen Orr, Liz Shaw, Harriet Hunt, Ruth Garside, Michael Nunns, Alke Gröppel-Wegener, Becky Whear |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 147 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 71 | 48% |
| United States | 6 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 1% |
| Ireland | 2 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 53 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 88 | 60% |
| Scientists | 38 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 18% |
| Unknown | 17 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 6% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 29% |
| Unknown | 18 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#457,902
of 25,830,657 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#46
of 2,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,291
of 450,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#1
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,830,657 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.