↓ Skip to main content

Lifestyle and in vitro fertilization: what do patients believe?

Overview of attention for article published in Fertility Research and Practice, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lifestyle and in vitro fertilization: what do patients believe?
Published in
Fertility Research and Practice, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40738-016-0026-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brooke V. Rossi, Leah Hawkins Bressler, Katharine F. Correia, Shane Lipskind, Mark D. Hornstein, Stacey A. Missmer

Abstract

Patients have many beliefs regarding lifestyle factors and IVF outcomes. Observational study of 208 IVF patients at an academic infertility center. Main outcome measures were perceived influence of various lifestyle factors assessed by multivariable logistic regression and p-value tests for linear trend (Pt). A majority of participants believed that there were many women's lifestyle choices that were influential, compared to fewer male factors (cessation of tobacco (72 %), alcohol (69 %), caffeine (62 %), and use of vitamins (88 %)). Compared to participants with less education, participants with a higher education level were less likely to believe vitamins were helpful and some alcohol use was not harmful. As income decreased, participants were less likely to consider dietary factors contributory to IVF success, such as women (p-trend, p = 0.02) and men (p-trend, p = 0.009) consuming a full-fat dairy diet. Participants' beliefs were most commonly influenced by physicians (84 %) and the internet (71 %). Patients believed many lifestyle factors are associated with IVF success. Understanding patients' assumptions regarding the effect of lifestyle factors on IVF success may better allow physicians to counsel patients about IVF outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 24%
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Researcher 2 4%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 18 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 20 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,882,468
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Fertility Research and Practice
#7
of 48 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,342
of 320,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fertility Research and Practice
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one scored the same or higher as 41 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them