You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical implementation of RNA sequencing for Mendelian disease diagnostics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Medicine, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13073-022-01019-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vicente A. Yépez, Mirjana Gusic, Robert Kopajtich, Christian Mertes, Nicholas H. Smith, Charlotte L. Alston, Rui Ban, Skadi Beblo, Riccardo Berutti, Holger Blessing, Elżbieta Ciara, Felix Distelmaier, Peter Freisinger, Johannes Häberle, Susan J. Hayflick, Maja Hempel, Yulia S. Itkis, Yoshihito Kishita, Thomas Klopstock, Tatiana D. Krylova, Costanza Lamperti, Dominic Lenz, Christine Makowski, Signe Mosegaard, Michaela F. Müller, Gerard Muñoz-Pujol, Agnieszka Nadel, Akira Ohtake, Yasushi Okazaki, Elena Procopio, Thomas Schwarzmayr, Joél Smet, Christian Staufner, Sarah L. Stenton, Tim M. Strom, Caterina Terrile, Frederic Tort, Rudy Van Coster, Arnaud Vanlander, Matias Wagner, Manting Xu, Fang, Daniele Ghezzi, Johannes A. Mayr, Dorota Piekutowska-Abramczuk, Antonia Ribes, Agnès Rötig, Robert W. Taylor, Saskia B. Wortmann, Kei Murayama, Thomas Meitinger, Julien Gagneur, Holger Prokisch |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Turkey | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| China | 1 | 7% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Scientists | 5 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 123 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 49 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 49 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,654,499
of 24,079,942 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#363
of 1,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,991
of 431,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#14
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,079,942 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.