↓ Skip to main content

Review: corneal endothelial cell derivation methods from ES/iPS cells

Overview of attention for article published in Inflammation and Regeneration, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Review: corneal endothelial cell derivation methods from ES/iPS cells
Published in
Inflammation and Regeneration, October 2019
DOI 10.1186/s41232-019-0108-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shin Hatou, Shigeto Shimmura

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 23%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 17 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 23%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 4%
Mathematics 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 23 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2023.
All research outputs
#5,450,007
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Inflammation and Regeneration
#57
of 258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,433
of 363,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inflammation and Regeneration
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.