You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
XCluSim: a visual analytics tool for interactively comparing multiple clustering results of bioinformatics data
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, August 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-16-s11-s5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sehi L'Yi, Bongkyung Ko, DongHwa Shin, Young-Joon Cho, Jaeyong Lee, Bohyoung Kim, Jinwook Seo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
Denmark | 1 | 2% |
Argentina | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 41 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 24% |
Student > Master | 10 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
Professor | 4 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 7 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 22 | 49% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 9 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,689,410
of 23,393,453 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,062
of 7,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,325
of 265,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#50
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,393,453 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.