↓ Skip to main content

A survey of energy drink consumption patterns among college students

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
q&a
1 Q&A thread
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
439 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
627 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A survey of energy drink consumption patterns among college students
Published in
Nutrition Journal, October 2007
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-6-35
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brenda M Malinauskas, Victor G Aeby, Reginald F Overton, Tracy Carpenter-Aeby, Kimberly Barber-Heidal

Abstract

Energy drink consumption has continued to gain in popularity since the 1997 debut of Red Bull, the current leader in the energy drink market. Although energy drinks are targeted to young adult consumers, there has been little research regarding energy drink consumption patterns among college students in the United States. The purpose of this study was to determine energy drink consumption patterns among college students, prevalence and frequency of energy drink use for six situations, namely for insufficient sleep, to increase energy (in general), while studying, driving long periods of time, drinking with alcohol while partying, and to treat a hangover, and prevalence of adverse side effects and energy drink use dose effects among college energy drink users. Based on the responses from a 32 member college student focus group and a field test, a 19 item survey was used to assess energy drink consumption patterns of 496 randomly surveyed college students attending a state university in the Central Atlantic region of the United States. Fifty one percent of participants (n = 253) reported consuming greater than one energy drink each month in an average month for the current semester (defined as energy drink user). The majority of users consumed energy drinks for insufficient sleep (67%), to increase energy (65%), and to drink with alcohol while partying (54%). The majority of users consumed one energy drink to treat most situations although using three or more was a common practice to drink with alcohol while partying (49%). Weekly jolt and crash episodes were experienced by 29% of users, 22% reported ever having headaches, and 19% heart palpitations from consuming energy drinks. There was a significant dose effect only for jolt and crash episodes. Using energy drinks is a popular practice among college students for a variety of situations. Although for the majority of situations assessed, users consumed one energy drink with a reported frequency of 1 - 4 days per month, many users consumed three or more when combining with alcohol while partying. Further, side effects from consuming energy drinks are fairly common, and a significant dose effect was found with jolt and crash episodes. Future research should identify if college students recognize the amounts of caffeine that are present in the wide variety of caffeine-containing products that they are consuming, the amounts of caffeine that they are consuming in various situations, and the physical side effects associated with caffeine consumption.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 627 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 616 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 205 33%
Student > Master 64 10%
Researcher 39 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 5%
Student > Postgraduate 30 5%
Other 85 14%
Unknown 170 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 10%
Psychology 54 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 8%
Social Sciences 28 4%
Other 143 23%
Unknown 183 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#644,932
of 24,842,061 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#195
of 1,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,018
of 83,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,842,061 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.