You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pursuing impact in research: towards an ethical approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-022-00754-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristine Bærøe, Angeliki Kerasidou, Michael Dunn, Inger Lise Teig |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 2 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Singapore | 2 | 13% |
| Belgium | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 19% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 5 | 16% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,971,894
of 24,796,076 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#399
of 1,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,829
of 435,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#9
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,796,076 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,071 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.