You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
EXpert consensus On Diaphragm UltraSonography in the critically ill (EXODUS): a Delphi consensus statement on the measurement of diaphragm ultrasound-derived parameters in a critical care setting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-022-03975-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark E. Haaksma, Jasper M. Smit, Alain Boussuges, Alexandre Demoule, Martin Dres, Giovanni Ferrari, Paolo Formenti, Ewan C. Goligher, Leo Heunks, Endry H. T. Lim, Lidwine B. Mokkink, Eleni Soilemezi, Zhonghua Shi, Michele Umbrello, Luigi Vetrugno, Emmanuel Vivier, Lei Xu, Massimo Zambon, Pieter R. Tuinman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 181 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 16 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 4% |
| Spain | 8 | 4% |
| United States | 5 | 3% |
| Japan | 5 | 3% |
| Italy | 5 | 3% |
| India | 5 | 3% |
| Colombia | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 33 | 18% |
| Unknown | 88 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 141 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 13% |
| Scientists | 12 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 42 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 109. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#393,426
of 25,822,778 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#207
of 6,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,751
of 451,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#7
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,822,778 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.