↓ Skip to main content

Antimicrobial activity of pure platelet-rich plasma against microorganisms isolated from oral cavity

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antimicrobial activity of pure platelet-rich plasma against microorganisms isolated from oral cavity
Published in
BMC Microbiology, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2180-13-47
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lorenzo Drago, Monica Bortolin, Christian Vassena, Silvio Taschieri, Massimo Del Fabbro

Abstract

Autologous platelet concentrates (PCs) have been extensively used in a variety of medical fields to promote soft and hard tissue regeneration. The significance behind their use lies in the abundance of growth factors in platelets α-granules that promotes wound healing. In addition, antibacterial properties of PCs against various bacteria have been recently pointed out. In this study, the antimicrobial effect of pure platelet-rich plasma (P-PRP) was evaluated against oral cavity microorganisms such as Enterococcus faecalis, Candida albicans, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus oralis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Blood samples were obtained from 17 patients who underwent oral surgery procedures involving the use of P-PRP. The antibacterial activity of P-PRP, evaluated as the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), was determined through the microdilution twofold serial method.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 149 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 17%
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 32 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 4%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 34 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2013.
All research outputs
#14,784,639
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#1,294
of 3,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,945
of 205,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#21
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.