↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Pulpotomy for the Management of Irreversible Pulpitis in Mature Teeth (PIP): a feasibility study

Overview of attention for article published in Pilot and Feasibility Studies, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction to: Pulpotomy for the Management of Irreversible Pulpitis in Mature Teeth (PIP): a feasibility study
Published in
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, April 2022
DOI 10.1186/s40814-022-01045-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan E. Clarkson, Craig R. Ramsay, Francesco Mannocci, Fadi Jarad, Sondos Albadri, David Ricketts, Carol Tait, Avijit Banerjee, Chris Deery, Dwayne Boyers, Zoe Marshman, Beatriz Goulao, Alice R. Hamilton, Katie Banister, Rosanne Bell, Lori Brown, David I. Conway, Pina Donaldson, Anne Duncan, Katharine Dunn, Patrick Fee, Mark Forrest, Anne-Marie Glenny, Jill Gouick, Ekta Gupta, Elisabet Jacobsen, Jennifer Kettle, Graeme MacLennan, Lorna Macpherson, Tina McGuff, Fiona Mitchell, Marjon van der Pol, Rebecca Moazzez, Douglas Roberston, Gabriella Wojewodka, Linda Young, Thomas Lamont

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 29%
Unspecified 2 29%
Librarian 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 29%
Engineering 2 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Computer Science 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2022.
All research outputs
#18,974,825
of 23,523,017 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#868
of 1,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#316,979
of 443,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#46
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,523,017 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.