You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Engineering stem cells to produce exosomes with enhanced bone regeneration effects: an alternative strategy for gene therapy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, March 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12951-022-01347-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Feiyang Li, Jun Wu, Daiye Li, Liuzhi Hao, Yanqun Li, Dan Yi, Kelvin W. K. Yeung, Di Chen, William W. Lu, Haobo Pan, Tak Man Wong, Xiaoli Zhao |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 16% |
Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
Researcher | 1 | 3% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 20 | 65% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 21 | 68% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,556,063
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#47
of 1,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,923
of 444,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#2
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,534 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.