You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Psychometric validation of the Self-Care Inventory-Revised (SCI-R) in UK adults with type 2 diabetes using data from the AT.LANTUS Follow-on study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-11-24 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Leena Khagram, Colin R Martin, Melanie J Davies, Jane Speight |
Abstract |
Achieving optimal outcomes in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) involves several demanding self-care behaviours, e.g. managing diet, activity, medications, monitoring glucose levels, footcare. The Self-Care Inventory-Revised (SCI-R) is valid for use in people with T2DM in the US. Our aim was to determine its suitability for use in the UK. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Canada | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 77 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
Researcher | 6 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
Lecturer | 5 | 6% |
Other | 24 | 30% |
Unknown | 21 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 15% |
Psychology | 7 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 14% |
Unknown | 25 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2013.
All research outputs
#12,871,568
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#963
of 2,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,147
of 192,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.