You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Optimization and enhancement of H&E stained microscopical images by applying bilinear interpolation method on lab color mode
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1742-4682-11-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kaya Kuru |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 20% |
| Unknown | 17 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 10 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 10% |
| Engineering | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 22 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,528,601
of 24,041,016 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling
#49
of 286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,362
of 315,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,041,016 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them