↓ Skip to main content

Incorporating nonlinearity into mediation analyses

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Incorporating nonlinearity into mediation analyses
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12874-017-0296-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

George J. Knafl, Kathleen A. Knafl, Margaret Grey, Jane Dixon, Janet A. Deatrick, Agatha M. Gallo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 8%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Other 12 24%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2022.
All research outputs
#15,232,080
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,419
of 2,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,106
of 327,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#35
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.