You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of saliva self-collection devices for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12879-022-07285-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Orchid M. Allicock, Mary E. Petrone, Devyn Yolda-Carr, Mallery Breban, Hannah Walsh, Anne E. Watkins, Jessica E. Rothman, Shelli F. Farhadian, Nathan D. Grubaugh, Anne L. Wyllie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 38% |
Australia | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 12% |
Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
Other | 14 | 28% |
Unknown | 17 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 22% |
Unknown | 17 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,906,861
of 23,578,176 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#1,598
of 7,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,243
of 442,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#47
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,862 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.