You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lymph node-targeted neoantigen nanovaccines potentiate anti-tumor immune responses of post-surgical melanoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-022-01397-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yanhong Chu, Lingyu Qian, Yaohua Ke, Xiaoyu Feng, Xinjie Chen, Fangcen Liu, Lixia Yu, Lianru Zhang, Yaping Tao, Rui Xu, Jia Wei, Baorui Liu, Qin Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 81% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 75% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2022.
All research outputs
#13,379,018
of 23,578,176 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#386
of 1,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,781
of 443,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#23
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,176 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,532 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.