You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of a low carbohydrate intake and standard carbohydrate intake on refeeding hypophosphatemia in children and adolescents with anorexia nervosa: a pilot randomised controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Eating Disorders, April 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40337-021-00519-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kellie Draffin, Jessica Hamilton, Shea Godsil, Suba Rudolph, Tim Crowe, Richard Newton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 4 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
Professor | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 16 | 52% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 10% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 15 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2022.
All research outputs
#15,603,335
of 25,502,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Eating Disorders
#712
of 962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,281
of 448,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Eating Disorders
#26
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,502,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.