You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Closed-loop oxygen control improves oxygen therapy in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients under high flow nasal oxygen: a randomized cross-over study (the HILOOP study)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-022-03970-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Oriol Roca, Oriol Caritg, Manel Santafé, Francisco J. Ramos, Andrés Pacheco, Marina García-de-Acilu, Ricard Ferrer, Marcus J. Schultz, Jean-Damien Ricard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 16% |
| United Arab Emirates | 2 | 11% |
| Spain | 2 | 11% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 5% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 18% |
| Unknown | 20 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 33% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 23 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,790,694
of 25,534,033 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,579
of 6,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,812
of 447,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#49
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,534,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.