You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
High-flow nasal cannula versus conventional oxygen therapy in acute COPD exacerbation with mild hypercapnia: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, April 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-022-03973-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jingen Xia, Sichao Gu, Wei Lei, Jihua Zhang, Hui Wei, Chao Liu, Han Zhang, Rongli Lu, Liqiong Zhang, Mingyan Jiang, Chao Hu, Zhenshun Cheng, Chaojie Wei, Yusheng Chen, Fengfeng Lu, Min Chen, Hong Bi, Hui Liu, Cunzi Yan, Hong Teng, Yang Yang, Chen Liang, Yanlei Ge, Pengguo Hou, Jialin Liu, Weiwei Gao, Yi Zhang, Yingying Feng, Cheng Tao, Xu Huang, Pinhua Pan, Hong Luo, Chunmei Yun, Qingyuan Zhan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 9% |
Mexico | 4 | 7% |
Brazil | 3 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
Saudi Arabia | 2 | 4% |
Colombia | 2 | 4% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 4% |
Ecuador | 2 | 4% |
Chile | 1 | 2% |
Other | 10 | 18% |
Unknown | 22 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 42 | 76% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 15% |
Scientists | 4 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 10% |
Unspecified | 6 | 8% |
Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 15% |
Unknown | 32 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 30% |
Unspecified | 6 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
Other | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 36 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,013,933
of 25,626,416 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#783
of 6,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,734
of 446,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#25
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,626,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,592 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.