You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High-resolution non-contrast free-breathing coronary cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography for detection of coronary artery disease: validation against invasive coronary angiography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-022-00858-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Muhummad Sohaib Nazir, Aurélien Bustin, Reza Hajhosseiny, Momina Yazdani, Matthew Ryan, Vittoria Vergani, Radhouene Neji, Karl P. Kunze, Edward Nicol, Pier Giorgio Masci, Divaka Perera, Sven Plein, Amedeo Chiribiri, René Botnar, Claudia Prieto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 30% |
| Chile | 2 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 20% |
| Scientists | 3 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,611,986
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#122
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,051
of 449,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.