↓ Skip to main content

Cross cultural evaluation of the Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS) -a mixed methods study

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cross cultural evaluation of the Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS) -a mixed methods study
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-11-27
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frances Taggart, Tim Friede, Scott Weich, Aileen Clarke, Mark Johnson, Sarah Stewart-Brown

Abstract

We aimed to validate the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) among English speaking adults representing two of the minority ethnic groups living in the UK, self-identified as Chinese or Pakistani by background, in a mixed methods study.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Unknown 141 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 22%
Student > Bachelor 24 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Researcher 10 7%
Other 32 22%
Unknown 18 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 46 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 17%
Social Sciences 19 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Arts and Humanities 4 3%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 23 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,044,563
of 19,529,814 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#266
of 2,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,463
of 164,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,529,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,038 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them