You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cross cultural evaluation of the Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS) -a mixed methods study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-11-27 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Frances Taggart, Tim Friede, Scott Weich, Aileen Clarke, Mark Johnson, Sarah Stewart-Brown |
| Abstract |
We aimed to validate the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) among English speaking adults representing two of the minority ethnic groups living in the UK, self-identified as Chinese or Pakistani by background, in a mixed methods study. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 181 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 11% |
| Researcher | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 36 | 20% |
| Unknown | 32 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 52 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 15% |
| Unknown | 39 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2020.
All research outputs
#4,168,063
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#371
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,166
of 205,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#2
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.