You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of left ventricular geometry after HeartMate II and HeartWare left ventricular assist device implantation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1749-8090-8-31 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Morteza Tavakkoli Hosseini, Aron Frederik Popov, Andre Ruediger Simon, Mohamed Amrani, Toufan Bahrami |
Abstract |
HeartMate II (HM II) and HeartWare (HW) Left Ventricular Assist Devices have been successfully used in end-stage heart failure patients as a bridge to transplantation, recovery, or decision. We set out to compare their effect in off-loading the left ventricle and its geometry. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 16 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 18% |
Researcher | 3 | 18% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Student > Master | 2 | 12% |
Other | 3 | 18% |
Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 35% |
Engineering | 5 | 29% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 12% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2013.
All research outputs
#14,164,012
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#274
of 1,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,456
of 192,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,208 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.