↓ Skip to main content

A comparative review of cell culture systems for the study of microglial biology in Alzheimer’s disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroinflammation, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
298 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
838 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparative review of cell culture systems for the study of microglial biology in Alzheimer’s disease
Published in
Journal of Neuroinflammation, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1742-2094-9-115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Branden Stansley, Jan Post, Kenneth Hensley

Abstract

Over the past two decades, it has become increasingly apparent that Alzheimer's disease neuropathology is characterized by activated microglia (brain resident macrophages) as well as the classic features of amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. The intricacy of microglial biology has also become apparent, leading to a heightened research interest in this particular cell type. Over the years a number of different microglial cell culturing techniques have been developed to study either primary mammalian microglia, or immortalized cell lines. Each microglial system has advantages and disadvantages and should be selected for its appropriateness in a particular research context. This review summarizes several of the most common microglial cell culture systems currently being employed in Alzheimer's research including primary microglia; BV2 and N9 retroviral immortalized microglia; human immortalized microglia (HMO6); and spontaneously immortalized rodent microglial lines (EOC lines and HAPI cells). Particularities of cell culture requirements and characteristics of microglial behavior, especially in response to applied inflammogen stimuli, are compared and discussed across these cell types.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 838 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Serbia 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 8 <1%
Unknown 808 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 198 24%
Researcher 134 16%
Student > Master 122 15%
Student > Bachelor 104 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 5%
Other 106 13%
Unknown 133 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 220 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 142 17%
Neuroscience 135 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 77 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 31 4%
Other 84 10%
Unknown 149 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,955,748
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#451
of 2,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,524
of 171,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#8
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.