You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Adult pancreatic cavernous hemangioma: case presentation of a benign tumor with a complex composition
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Gastroenterology, November 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12876-019-1119-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tao Lianyuan, Wang Yafeng, Yu Haibo, Dong Yadong, Ma Jiahao, Lu Yuanxiang, Li Deyu |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,657,585
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from BMC Gastroenterology
#494
of 1,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,099
of 460,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Gastroenterology
#13
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.