You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Zambia Assessment of Tuberculosis (TB) and HIV in the Mines (ZATHIM): implications for programs and policies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-022-13053-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Jean Podewils, Elizabeth F. Long, Tyler J. Fuller, David Mwakazanga, Kelvin Kapungu, Mathias Tembo, Sydney Mwanza, Kathryn G. Curran, Jonathan P. Smith, James L. Tobias, Webster Kasongo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 26 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 25 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2022.
All research outputs
#14,602,602
of 23,822,306 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,402
of 15,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,873
of 444,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#323
of 502 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,822,306 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 502 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.