You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy in Germany: clinical results after 2 years
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-021-01783-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katharina Vill, Oliver Schwartz, Astrid Blaschek, Dieter Gläser, Uta Nennstiel, Brunhilde Wirth, Siegfried Burggraf, Wulf Röschinger, Marc Becker, Ludwig Czibere, Jürgen Durner, Katja Eggermann, Bernhard Olgemöller, Erik Harms, Ulrike Schara, Heike Kölbel, Wolfgang Müller-Felber |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 128 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 58 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 55 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,170,782
of 25,701,027 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#120
of 3,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,231
of 456,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#6
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,701,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.