↓ Skip to main content

Feasibility of randomizing Danish citizens aged 65–79 years to high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine vs. standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine in a pragmatic registry-based setting…

Overview of attention for article published in Pilot and Feasibility Studies, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
27 X users

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Feasibility of randomizing Danish citizens aged 65–79 years to high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine vs. standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine in a pragmatic registry-based setting: rationale and design of the DANFLU-1 Trial
Published in
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, April 2022
DOI 10.1186/s40814-022-01044-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niklas Dyrby Johansen, Daniel Modin, Joshua Nealon, Sandrine Samson, Camille Salamand, Carsten Schade Larsen, Brian L. Claggett, Scott D. Solomon, Martin J. Landray, Gunnar H. Gislason, Lars Køber, Jens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen, Pradeesh Sivapalan, Lasse Skafte Vestergaard, Palle Valentiner-Branth, Tyra Grove Krause, Tor Biering-Sørensen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 18%
Other 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 8 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 18%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 7 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,527,619
of 24,754,968 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#57
of 1,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,340
of 433,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#4
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,754,968 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.