↓ Skip to main content

Delivering at home or in a health facility? health-seeking behaviour of women and the role of traditional birth attendants in Tanzania

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
387 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Delivering at home or in a health facility? health-seeking behaviour of women and the role of traditional birth attendants in Tanzania
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-13-55
Pubmed ID
Authors

Constanze Pfeiffer, Rosemarie Mwaipopo

Abstract

Traditional birth attendants retain an important role in reproductive and maternal health in Tanzania. The Tanzanian Government promotes TBAs in order to provide maternal and neonatal health counselling and initiating timely referral, however, their role officially does not include delivery attendance. Yet, experience illustrates that most TBAs still often handle complicated deliveries. Therefore, the objectives of this research were to describe (1) women's health-seeking behaviour and experiences regarding their use of antenatal (ANC) and postnatal care (PNC); (2) their rationale behind the choice of place and delivery; and to learn (3) about the use of traditional practices and resources applied by traditional birth attendants (TBAs) and how they can be linked to the bio-medical health system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 387 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 3 <1%
Nigeria 2 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 374 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 97 25%
Researcher 46 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 11%
Student > Bachelor 42 11%
Student > Postgraduate 35 9%
Other 70 18%
Unknown 55 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 123 32%
Social Sciences 58 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 57 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 3%
Other 56 14%
Unknown 67 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2023.
All research outputs
#6,046,748
of 24,661,808 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#1,514
of 4,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,482
of 197,327 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#34
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,661,808 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,604 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,327 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.