↓ Skip to main content

Service delivery in Kenyan district hospitals – what can we learn from literature on mid-level managers?

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Service delivery in Kenyan district hospitals – what can we learn from literature on mid-level managers?
Published in
Human Resources for Health, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1478-4491-11-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacinta Nzinga, Lairumbi Mbaabu, Mike English

Abstract

There is a growing emphasis on the need to tackle inadequate human resources for health (HRH) as an essential part of strengthening health systems; but the focus is mostly on macro-level issues, such as training, recruitment, skill mix and distribution. Few attempts have been made to understand the capability of health workers, their motivation and other structural and organizational aspects of systems that influence workforce performance. We have examined literature on the roles of mid-level managers to help us understand how they might influence service delivery quality in Kenyan hospitals. In the Kenyan hospital settings, these are roles that head of departments who are also clinical or nursing service providers might play.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Unknown 145 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 24%
Researcher 20 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Other 10 7%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 30 20%
Unknown 22 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 17 11%
Social Sciences 16 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 4%
Other 30 20%
Unknown 30 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2013.
All research outputs
#16,579,551
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#1,117
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,910
of 205,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.