↓ Skip to main content

Gender differences in the use of transportation services to community rehabilitation programs

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Geriatrics, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gender differences in the use of transportation services to community rehabilitation programs
Published in
BMC Geriatrics, June 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2318-9-24
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nanako Tamiya, Li-Mei Chen, Yasuki Kobayashi, Mariko Kaneda, Eiji Yano

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 29%
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Librarian 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 7 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 21%
Psychology 3 13%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,754,533
of 23,571,271 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#1,830
of 3,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,133
of 112,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,571,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.