You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stratified sampling design and loss to follow-up in survival models: evaluation of efficiency and bias
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-11-99 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cibele C César, Marilia S Carvalho |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 22% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 22% |
| Unknown | 14 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,749,471
of 23,563,389 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,130
of 2,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,394
of 116,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#7
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,563,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,079 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.