You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Survival and biomarker analysis for ovarian mucinous carcinoma according to invasive patterns: retrospective analysis and review literature
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Ovarian Research, February 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13048-021-00783-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Taira Hada, Morikazu Miyamoto, Hiroki Ishibashi, Hiroko Matsuura, Takahiro Sakamoto, Soichiro Kakimoto, Hideki Iwahashi, Hitoshi Tsuda, Masashi Takano |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 36% |
Researcher | 1 | 9% |
Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 36% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,291,863
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ovarian Research
#57
of 611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,527
of 518,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ovarian Research
#4
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 611 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.