You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The effect of animal versus plant protein on muscle mass, muscle strength, physical performance and sarcopenia in adults: protocol for a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, April 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13643-022-01951-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rachel J. Reid-McCann, Sarah F. Brennan, Michelle C. McKinley, Claire T. McEvoy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 25% |
France | 2 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 17 | 85% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 112 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 4% |
Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 4% |
Lecturer | 4 | 4% |
Other | 18 | 16% |
Unknown | 71 | 63% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 9% |
Unknown | 75 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,014,316
of 25,345,468 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#135
of 2,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,324
of 437,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#3
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,345,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.