You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of two dengue NS1 rapid tests for sensitivity, specificity and relationship to viraemia and antibody responses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, May 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2334-10-142 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vianney Tricou, Hang TT Vu, Nhu VN Quynh, Chau VV Nguyen, Hien T Tran, Jeremy Farrar, Bridget Wills, Cameron P Simmons |
| Abstract |
Dengue is a major public health problem in tropical and subtropical countries. Rapid and easy diagnosis of dengue can assist patient triage and care-management. The detection of DENV NS1 on rapid lateral flow tests offers a fast route to a presumptive dengue diagnosis but careful evaluations are urgently needed as more and more people use them. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Vietnam | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| French Polynesia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 221 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 49 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 17% |
| Unknown | 45 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 14 | 6% |
| Engineering | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 13% |
| Unknown | 57 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,152,945
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#1,332
of 7,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,325
of 95,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#12
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.