You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Correction: PIK3CA mutation correlates with mTOR pathway expression but not clinical and pathological features in Fibro-adipose vascular anomaly (FAVA)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diagnostic Pathology, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13000-022-01224-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yumiko Hori, Katsutoshi Hirose, Michio Ozeki, Kenji Hata, Daisuke Motooka, Shinichiro Tahara, Takahiro Matsui, Masaharu Kohara, Hiroki Higashihara, Yusuke Ono, Kaishu Tanaka, Satoru Toyosawa, Eiichi Morii |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2022.
All research outputs
#20,712,517
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#961
of 1,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#360,387
of 442,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,149 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.