You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Batch-effect detection, correction and characterisation in Illumina HumanMethylation450 and MethylationEPIC BeadChip array data
Clinical Epigenetics, April 2022
Jason P. Ross, Susan van Dijk, Melinda Phang, Michael R. Skilton, Peter L. Molloy, Yalchin Oytam
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||5||16%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||3||9%|
|Student > Master||3||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||13||41%|
|Immunology and Microbiology||1||3%|
|Physics and Astronomy||1||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2022.
All research outputs
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epigenetics
of 1,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 442,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epigenetics
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.