↓ Skip to main content

Low omega-6 vs. low omega-6 plus high omega-3 dietary intervention for Chronic Daily Headache: Protocol for a randomized clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Low omega-6 vs. low omega-6 plus high omega-3 dietary intervention for Chronic Daily Headache: Protocol for a randomized clinical trial
Published in
Trials, April 2011
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-12-97
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher E Ramsden, J Douglas Mann, Keturah R Faurot, Chanee Lynch, Syed Taha Imam, Beth A MacIntosh, Joseph R Hibbeln, James Loewke, Sunyata Smith, Rebecca Coble, Chirayath Suchindran, Susan A Gaylord

Abstract

Targeted analgesic dietary interventions are a promising strategy for alleviating pain and improving quality of life in patients with persistent pain syndromes, such as chronic daily headache (CDH). High intakes of the omega-6 (n-6) polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), linoleic acid (LA) and arachidonic acid (AA) may promote physical pain by increasing the abundance, and subsequent metabolism, of LA and AA in immune and nervous system tissues. Here we describe methodology for an ongoing randomized clinical trial comparing the metabolic and clinical effects of a low n-6, average n-3 PUFA diet, to the effects of a low n-6 plus high n-3 PUFA diet, in patients with CDH. Our primary aim is to determine if: A) both diets reduce n-6 PUFAs in plasma and erythrocyte lipid pools, compared to baseline; and B) the low n-6 plus high n-3 diet produces a greater decline in n-6 PUFAs, compared to the low n-6 diet alone. Secondary clinical outcomes include headache-specific quality-of-life, and headache frequency and intensity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 95 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Master 10 10%
Other 9 9%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 23 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Psychology 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 27 27%