You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Explaining the effect on food selection of altering availability: two experimental studies on the role of relative preferences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-022-13067-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachel Pechey, Gareth J. Hollands, Theresa M. Marteau |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 43% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 20% |
| Professor | 1 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 10% |
| Psychology | 1 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,222,768
of 23,709,010 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,530
of 15,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,388
of 443,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#216
of 504 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,709,010 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 504 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.