You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lynch syndrome testing of colorectal cancer patients in a high-income country with universal healthcare: a retrospective study of current practice and gaps in seven australian hospitals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13053-022-00225-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julia Steinberg, Priscilla Chan, Emily Hogden, Gabriella Tiernan, April Morrow, Yoon-Jung Kang, Emily He, Rebecca Venchiarutti, Leanna Titterton, Lucien Sankey, Amy Pearn, Cassandra Nichols, Skye McKay, Anne Hayward, Natasha Egoroff, Alexander Engel, Peter Gibbs, Annabel Goodwin, Marion Harris, James G Kench, Nicholas Pachter, Bonny Parkinson, Peter Pockney, Abiramy Ragunathan, Courtney Smyth, Michael Solomon, Daniel Steffens, James Wei Tatt Toh, Marina Wallace, Karen Canfell, Anthony Gill, Finlay Macrae, Kathy Tucker, Natalie Taylor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 5 | 38% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 1 | 17% |
| Researcher | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 1 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,362,334
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice
#24
of 261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,460
of 446,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 261 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.