You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevalence-dependent use of serological tests for diagnosing glanders in horses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Veterinary Research, September 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-6148-5-32 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa D Sprague, Reena Zachariah, Heinrich Neubauer, Renate Wernery, Maria Joseph, Holger C Scholz, Ulrich Wernery |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 21% |
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Professor | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 43% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 7% |
| Energy | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2022.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#724
of 3,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,365
of 102,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,297 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.